Sorry, but your attempt to look cool and smart utterly failed. I'd like to counter some of you blab^H^H^H^H elaborations but there is not even a clear line nor does your "thinking" carry the weight to deserve it.
As for your language Onyx (btw. do you call everything you do "Onyx"?) I'm acutely disinterested to even look at it. Nothing in your article, that you so proudly linked, created enough interest - and trust in your competence - to at least glance over it. Btw, Nim _does have_ quite a few (and more than most common languages - incl. Rust) features that enable good quality and safe code. About the only accusation that could be made against Nim's inventor and BDFL is that he didn't paint them yellow and black to be immediately spotted by even very superficial observers like yourself. I wish you lots of fun and even success with Onyx but kindly refrain from telling us more about it. 90++% of Nim developers are quite happy with Nim. btw, FWIW, my field is IT security and I consider Nim the next best language to (and much more comfortable than) Ada. [Personal note: Strange, the Russian colleagues I've had the pleasure to meet have been intelligent, competent and smart ...]
