> Well I don't see what's wrong with how the RFC went I think it went very well; maybe I should have put my thoughts into another RFC. It began for me as a question, but of course, as I dug deeper my opinions started to crystallize.
Reading back, i realize my snarky 'cargo cult' comment could be interpreted as applying to the rfc participants, when my intention was to throw shade on Julia and the unicode consortium. Sorry. > why the particular set of operators is problematic. other than black star and bullet operator, the set is easy to reason about, especially when entering characters by name. circled dot operator, squared dot operator... bullet operator? > Supporting all of Unicode seems crazy > > it tastes well when used with care I couldn't agree more, and I do trust you and all the contributors to act with more care than Julia in this. For my part, I'm asking what are the first principles upon which: * subsets of glyphs are identified as being 'operator-like' * single members of those subsets are chosen to be operators
