Wouldn't `mask_with` be more meaningful than `and=`? similarly with the others?
(I might be misremembering which is used for what.)
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? tsojtsoj
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? cantanima
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? ElegantBeef
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? Araq
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? Clonk
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? Hlaaftana
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xo... ynfle
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... treeform
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... juancarlospaco
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... tsojtsoj
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... ynfle
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... tsojtsoj
