We write a lot of bit-fiddling code and I feel the `or=`, `and=` and `xor=` are just too rare to be useful. I would prefer Nim language to stay smaller...
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? tsojtsoj
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? cantanima
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? ElegantBeef
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? Araq
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? Clonk
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xor=`? Hlaaftana
- What about `or=`, `and=` and `xo... ynfle
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... treeform
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... juancarlospaco
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... tsojtsoj
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... ynfle
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... tsojtsoj
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... Araq
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... tsojtsoj
- What about `or=`, `and=` and... mratsim
