> I have the impression people here feel superior for using or creating Nim and > look at others as not worth having them in the boat.
I think the main sentiment is that people see Nim as a fragile baby that either needs to be defended from any attackers or needs every possible weak point to be analyzed before _gasp_ it doesn't receive mainstream adoption and replace Python in all use cases. Meaning this goes both ways. Not only is this a superfluous goal, no one is qualified enough of a social engineer to make it happen. Only the opinion of the software engineers matter, stuff like "SSL documentation being copy pasted to the wrapper would make my life easier" are acceptable viewpoints of software engineers Also reading the original post again I've thought of another point, I know I've had a bit of a streak of weird opinions about this but a lot of the documentation is not written by native English speakers unlike most other popular or upcoming languages. There are sometimes teams dedicated to documentation like this
