>From the Nim manual > For reasons of simplicity of implementation the types uint and uint64 are not > ordinal types.
I bumped into a case while working with uint64 that I wanted to use a uint64 in a **case**; obviously there weren't really that many cases and I could easily map to a smaller range, but after that bump I got curious as to why this restriction is here. As long as I'm asking, any plans for int128/uint128?
