IMHO skins are cancer. Problem of Nim is that it is trying to be 
best-everything all at once. Result of this is over a decade of unstable 
language which did not reach 1.0 yet. Yes, we all have our own tastes. I 
dislike some stuff in nim as well. I can get used to them if language is 
solving my problems however. Having multiple syntaxes would just contribute to 
fragmenting ecosystem. Is it worth to do this to language only to attract few 
naysayers who can not see past their opinions? I would say that its not. Python 
(once again) is doing fine without all this madness because it is a good 
language. If nim is a good language it will do fine as well without trying to 
appease just about every needy programmer out there. You can not make everybody 
happy. Ever.

Reply via email to