I think that also the question is whether we (you rather) are making practical language or academic one. I am not sure if both can be successfully combined (although such approach worked for pypy they say). Endow language with all shiny, "it is how it should be" etc. concepts, which can by the way confuse people, can (when not careful) make a garbage. But let's make 1.0 version. Make it useful, stable, not bugged, otherwise it will never end.
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' jlp765
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' Libman
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' spip
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' anon
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' vega
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' dom96
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' Jehan
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' mmierzwa
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' Araq
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' Lando
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' mmierzwa
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' anon
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' scriptkiddy
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' Krux02
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' Libman
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' Libman
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' mmierzwa
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' Krux02
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' rku
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' Libman
- Re: Nim Syntax ''Skins'' scriptkiddy