Conventionally standard library is part of the language spec. If you look at 
the C Reference Manual, you'll see that roughly half of the spec is devoted to 
specifying the stdlib. It would remove a lot of confusion if the set of .magic 
modules would be named as the standard library and the "standard library" 
something else.

Also I think that language conformance test suite should not test any modules 
that are not part of the language spec. Also, Rosetta Code examples should be 
solved (as much as possible) with the tools provided by language spec, not with 
help of non-standard modules like strutils or sequtils.

Reply via email to