> So it exists but is not available yet. which, for all practical purposes, is equivalent to its not existing at all. I am just cautious, nothing more.
In the meanwhile however, most of his ideas are appealing for high performance computing in general and I wonder how hard it would be to implement such an abstraction in Nim... That said, it was not my intent to shamelessly hijack your thread: OOP is often nice to reason about and not so hard to debug depending on how you do it (just like functional programming), however it is true that it is full of indirections and generally slower that an FP equivalent. All I wanted to say is that OOP might not be doomed after all.
