> Skins were part of my original Nim "vision". Nobody's perfect
That vision is consistent with the style insensitive naming, which I'm also not crazy about. > There is a big difference between features that cost us manpower (cough > concepts) and > features that are mostly free of maintenance (parsers are > simple). Cost aside, some features have more value, and some of us perceive the value of skins as negative, not even zero. I perceive the value of concepts as high. I realize that's all subjective.
