@rayman22201 what I have seen is, that each proc that has a var of a type which is handled by a destructor needs a hidden try finally block (currently even if the var is not used). This can be a big overhead for small routines. The c target needs setjump/longjump which is a big overhead. The cpp target is better here, because it uses native exception handling.
- Re: What's happening with destructors? mratsim
- Re: What's happening with destructors? bpr
- Re: What's happening with destructors? mratsim
- Re: What's happening with destructors? Araq
- Re: What's happening with destructors? bpr
- Re: What's happening with destructors? monster
- Re: What's happening with destructors? Araq
- Re: What's happening with destructors? bpr
- Re: What's happening with destructors? rayman22201
- Re: What's happening with destructors? monster
- Re: What's happening with destructors? adrianv
- Re: What's happening with destructors? Araq
- Re: What's happening with destructors? rayman22201
- Re: What's happening with destructors? Araq
- Re: What's happening with destructors? Udiknedormin
- Re: What's happening with destructors? Araq
- Re: What's happening with destructors? bpr
- Re: What's happening with destructors? Araq
- Re: What's happening with destructors? rayman22201
- Re: What's happening with destructors? mratsim
- Re: What's happening with destructors? Araq
