> So why not using C# then? (evil smile) C # is bound to NET platform. And this is his main, but in many cases - a significant minus. Nim - self-sufficient, self-contained - and that I like.
> That is 0.77 using this exact code I also compiled with the -d: release and --opt: size. Apparently, you have a much faster computer. I have a 4-core, but rather the old generation. Ok. Let us assume that the code as fast as in C#. In addition, C # uses to restart the cached version of the program. I have run-time C # code is restarted. The first time it runs about 4 seconds.
