Yeah, well, `runnableExamples` is exactly what its name says, it's both, it's documentation that is **checked**. You dislike this conflation, but I like it (and hopefully others too) and I 've seen how Nim worked before we had them, it was worse. And to find out how well D's `unittest` works you can read on the D forum about them, they are not loved either. ;-)
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be preferred to `.. c... dom96
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be preferred to ... gemath
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be preferred... miran
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be prefe... juancarlospaco
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be prefe... dom96
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be prefe... Araq
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be prefe... gemath
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be prefe... timothee
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be prefe... Araq
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be prefe... gemath
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be prefe... Araq
- Re: runnableExamples should generally be prefe... gemath
