> Yeah, well, runnableExamples is exactly what its name says, it's both, it's > documentation that is checked. You dislike this conflation, but I like it ...
If "testing" in `runnableExamples` means "checking doc code examples", I actually like it very much. If it means "running unit tests", and [that's how it is understood](https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/4279) by some, I don't like it at all. > .... but should be solved by the editor's code-folding capabilities ... Many other source code aware tools/IDE features will also have to be aware of `runnableExamples` to be ignored, ignoring comments is something they already know.
