@andrea I get your point and you are probably right. My apologies.
What I meant was that Nim seems not (yet) to be far and/or good enough to be in the upper rankings - which, of course, may also be due to simply not yet having adequate code to TE. That's why I pointed out and insisted that I'm _not_ criticizing Nim but think that the _state_ of Nim still is somewhat unsatisfying. Which again is the reason why I think that we should put all work on gadgets and new features aside and rather focus on getting the basics/what we already have stable. Anyway, I'm _always_ speaking as a convinced Nim fan.
