> Well noted, I could provide more detail (and I did for Nim which is worth it) > but I don't for D.
No you didn't develop for Nim as well. > With all due respect I'm not interested in your list. Those things are > technicalities. A good language, however, needs deeper insights (I'd even say > wisdom). Your argument basically boils down to braces vs no-braces, while you dismiss my list as technicalities I could also dismiss yours as superficiality.
