I'm very happy to see so much energy in the Nim forum on Nim advocacy but let's stop throwing mud balls at each other ;).
What was promising in this thread was starting to identify a couple of audiences that would be interested in Nim (say system programming, embedded devices, cryptographers, machine learning engineers, ...). And we could have people experienced in each field write wiki posts or blog articles "Nim for embedded devices". It's important to have someone that knows what his peers are looking for in a language as there is no one-size-fits-all presentation of Nim. For example some would be absolutely uninterested in the GC (apart from how to disable it) and want to know Nim pointer and value type story while others would require a GC, no pointer at all and want to know about polypmorphism.
