I'm sorry if I missed something in this discussion or other sources on this topic, but I have a question. Is the newruntime approach planned to become the main way of using Nim or will it stay optional? Should I expect the GC to be removed at some point in the future or can I rely on it staying, even if it might change to a different behaviour or way of usage?
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime dom96
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Sixte
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Araq
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime rayman22201
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime cdome
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime andrea
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime cdome
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Araq
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime cdome
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Araq
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Akito
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Araq
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime GordonBGood
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Araq
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Sixte
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Araq
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime GordonBGood
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Sixte
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Sixte
- Re: Nim's future: GC and the newruntime Araq
