Re: Norm 2.0.0

[cumulonimbus]

That's a nice use of dup, I wasn't aware it could take multiple procs - and I 
think the name "flow" would be more standard for this use case if it is ever 
revised -- but I do not suggest changing a name - 99% of the cases probably 
involve exactly one proc for which the name "dup" is definitely fine, and also, 
backward compatibility >> naming preferences.