I don't disagree. Might need delving into the generated C to figure out, but I'm guessing my results are not hard to reproduce. If they are let me know how I can best help.
- NvP: s.add('x') 100M times HashBackupJim
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times Araq
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times HashBackupJim
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times Araq
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cumulonimbus
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times b3liever
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times b3liever
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times sschwarzer
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times sschwarzer
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times HashBackupJim
