I don't see how your linked algo explains deltas across gcs if that `3 div 2` growth happens for all of them. The memory `gc:arc` uses here seems more like the sum of all prior allocations, not "up to 1.5x what's needed". Actually, `gc:arc` uses 1.25x more mem than `gc:none` (312MB) in a test I just tried.
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times HashBackupJim
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times Araq
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cumulonimbus
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times b3liever
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times b3liever
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times sschwarzer
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times sschwarzer
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times HashBackupJim
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times sschwarzer
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times HashBackupJim
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times Araq
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
