Thanks for the tip. I knew about this sizing trick for tables, and it did save a lot of RAM ina small test (large table) because it avoided resizes, but wasn't aware strings had a similar thing. I read the Nim manual, but stuff only sticks when doing a lot of coding in a new language and I'm not there yet.
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times b3liever
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times b3liever
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times sschwarzer
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times sschwarzer
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times HashBackupJim
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times sschwarzer
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times HashBackupJim
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times Araq
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times Araq
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
- Re: NvP: s.add('x') 100M times cblake
