[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pjotr Prins) writes: > Updated descriptions. Note the non-commercial license.
If the license scheme is along the lines of "gratis for non-commercial use", then it's non-free software per [0] (it violates Freedoms 0 and 2) and it would be better to use the string "non-free" as the `license' attribute IMO. It may also mean that it cannot be freely distributed, e.g., through Nixpkgs channels, which you may want to indicate prominently so that the TU Delft people don't run into troubles. If you are planning to contribute other packages, you should probably ask Eelco an SVN account. Thanks, Ludovic. [0] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
