[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pjotr Prins) writes: > But I would disagree it is 'commercial jargon'. We have academic > licenses - and have to find a way to tag them as such.
The term "academic license" really *is* unclear. Most proprietary software vendors, such as Microsoft, have what they call "academic licenses", which in this case means that they propose a bargain to their academic customers (universities, labs). But of course, this does not change the licensing terms of the software, and it certainly doesn't make it anything close to free (as in "freedom") or open-source software. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
