> No it isn't. Peter announced a change in advance, giving other people a > change > to respond. So do you object to merging the parallel build stuff? In general no - I hoped that the list discussed an enhancement of it till the end - which would satisfy me as well.
In particular Peter missed (/ ignored?) two of my requests to give yet another short reply. So I intervened and reminded of it a third time. What do I want? Discuss whether you want to merge Peters patches first - and my enhancement later (which will cause heavy rebuilds on trunk two times) - or whether you would accept this idea sot hat the enhancement can be merged. It takes me 2 days max to prepare those patches. Additional I'd like to ask people in general to replace "dislikings" by proposals - which includes acknowledging that the goal has been reached after a second patch series has been send. Eelco Dolstra - you somehow missed having a quick glance at this patch series we came up with and agreed uppon to replace the solution you disliked http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.nixos/4497 Marc Weber _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.cs.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
