Hi Andres, > If you're unhappy with the way Nix is being run, why not bring it up > and try to convince people to change the overall policy [...]?
where exactly could anyone bring anything up so that "people" change NixOS policy? Who exactly has the ability to change NixOS policy? What exactly *is* NixOS's policy? Eelco revoked all access of all regular contributors without prior warning. Until it suddenly happened, there was not the slightest indication that we would be losing access to the infrastructure that we have helped build over the last couple of years. Is that in your opinion the proper way to handle a community project? > I could somehow understand it if your decision was perceived by me as > the outcome of a failed attempt of convincing the project to go in > this direction, but afaics, you haven't even tried. You shouldn't jump to conclusions. I have expressed my dissatisfaction with Eelco's nontransparent decisions to him in private e-mail. However, he brushed me off, and told me that I don't need commit rights to NixOS because we have a distributed VCS now, so I can commit wherever I want instead of being restricted to his repository. Go figure. Take care, Peter _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
