> What I am saying is that after 4 years of continuous work on Nix, I have > a significant investment in this project, and changes that are made to > this project affect me personally and professionally in ways that may > not be obvious to the person who is making that change. Which is why you can't accept democracy either :) (sorry).
But its great - that we all agree that hydra is the key point for professional usage. Thus free-nix is about having a free to use hydra? > Can you see why I am kind-of unhappy right now? Yes - sure. And you will probably also see that free-nix can't be lead by democracy either, because you have nixos installed on 100 machines now - This I don't think its going to solve your problems unless the majority agrees on "we will do whatever is necessary to keep your machines running" :) What we really need is a hydra we all have kind of control over - so that we all can build and test our experimental branches ourselves. And here expenses are involved - (which is usually a problem for open source projects - which is why most of them don't want to touch money at all) Anyway: That nixos starts being used that much is a great sign - we should celebrate it :) My two cents. Marc Weber _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
