In this case the problem isn't a package but using the interactive shell. Could I get an updated version of that just for interactive use but not for building new packages?
Lluís Batlle i Rossell <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:14:55AM -0500, Malcolm Matalka wrote: >> How bad is this to do in my own branch? I've only fooled with nixpkgs a bit. > > You'll loose prebuilt binaries from hydra. Other than that, all should be > fine. > > Remember that if that annoys you in some specific package, you can override > the > bash in that package, only. Not /bin/sh though. > >> Peter Simons <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Hi Malcolm, >> > >> > > This appears to be an acknowledged bug in bash with a patch out[1]. Is >> > > this coming to NixOS? Is it here right now and I just am not upgrading >> > > properly? >> > >> > updates to Bash take a while to arrive in Nixpkgs, because a change like >> > that trigger rebuilds of every single package that we have. I guess, the >> > patch will be included when the stdenv-updates branch is going to merged >> > the next time. >> > >> > Take care, >> > Peter >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nix-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> nix-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
