On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 08:20:33AM -0500, Malcolm Matalka wrote: > In this case the problem isn't a package but using the interactive > shell. Could I get an updated version of that just for interactive use > but not for building new packages?
Ah, an interactive shell does not mean any change in stdenv. Sure, you can change the expression for bashInteractive as you wish. > Lluís Batlle i Rossell <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:14:55AM -0500, Malcolm Matalka wrote: > >> How bad is this to do in my own branch? I've only fooled with nixpkgs a > >> bit. > > > > You'll loose prebuilt binaries from hydra. Other than that, all should be > > fine. > > > > Remember that if that annoys you in some specific package, you can override > > the > > bash in that package, only. Not /bin/sh though. > > > >> Peter Simons <[email protected]> writes: > >> > >> > Hi Malcolm, > >> > > >> > > This appears to be an acknowledged bug in bash with a patch out[1]. > >> > Is > >> > > this coming to NixOS? Is it here right now and I just am not > >> > upgrading > >> > > properly? > >> > > >> > updates to Bash take a while to arrive in Nixpkgs, because a change like > >> > that trigger rebuilds of every single package that we have. I guess, the > >> > patch will be included when the stdenv-updates branch is going to merged > >> > the next time. > >> > > >> > Take care, > >> > Peter > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > nix-dev mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >> _______________________________________________ > >> nix-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
