Hi, On 14/06/14 17:05, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
> Well, let's not try to decide the undecidable. Would it be so bad to > have explicit dependencies? One of Nix's main selling points is that you *don't* need to specify runtime dependencies explicitly. That has worked great for the last ten years, so I'm rather hesitant to change this. Of course, you can always make runtime dependencies explicit in the way you describe, but it's important to be aware that packages that require this are broken (e.g. they won't work with Nix's --repair flag and multiple output support, because these use hash rewriting). -- Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://nixos.org/~eelco/ _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
