>>>>> Shea Levy <[email protected]> writes: > Recursive nix is unused because it was unfinished and it was too much > potential work to keep going without some sign it would be merged.
Then I vote for a review of recursive nix, and to merge in the other two as they stand. Can you help me understand recursive nix a bit more? I'm willing to dig into it with some intro. John _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
