One note: * edolstra <https://github.com/edolstra> * commented on Feb 28 <https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/213#issuecomment-36334864>
Probably best to do it after 1.7. So Eelco is okay with a merge of recursive nix. https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/213 I'm impressed by the volume of work Shea has done. John, since Eelco had a look, I think it's probably worth a merge. On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:43 AM, John Wiegley <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> Shea Levy <[email protected]> writes: > > > Recursive nix is unused because it was unfinished and it was too much > > potential work to keep going without some sign it would be merged. > > Then I vote for a review of recursive nix, and to merge in the other two as > they stand. > > Can you help me understand recursive nix a bit more? I'm willing to dig > into > it with some intro. > > John > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
