That would be over-engineering instead. Your event system would have to talk with the init system with some IPC. So no, it shouldn't be externalized.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Alexander Zubkov <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, copy-pasted the wrong link: > http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/ > > On 10/19/2014 02:42 PM, Luca Bruno wrote: > >> My reason for using systemd compared to nosh, uselessd, sysvinit, openrc >> or >> whatelse is that it's integrated with the event system (udev). That is the >> real advantage of systemd and you should think more about this kind of >> advantage. >> >> My reason to hate systemd is that it has other components that have been >> moved into system without a strong rationale. All of those components >> could >> have been externalized in some way instead of being rewritten. >> >> So if uselessd wouldn't drop all the .timer, .device etc. and the udev >> integration, it would be a real alternative. >> > > But .timer .device etc is "those components could have been externalized > in some way instead of being rewritten"? > As I understand their page, it all was dropped in uselessd. > > -- www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
