And what you need from the integration of systemd with udev? What use-cases do you have for this?
On 10/19/2014 02:57 PM, Luca Bruno wrote: > That would be over-engineering instead. Your event system would have to > talk with the init system with some IPC. So no, it shouldn't be > externalized. > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Alexander Zubkov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sorry, copy-pasted the wrong link: >> http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/ >> >> On 10/19/2014 02:42 PM, Luca Bruno wrote: >> >>> My reason for using systemd compared to nosh, uselessd, sysvinit, openrc >>> or >>> whatelse is that it's integrated with the event system (udev). That is the >>> real advantage of systemd and you should think more about this kind of >>> advantage. >>> >>> My reason to hate systemd is that it has other components that have been >>> moved into system without a strong rationale. All of those components >>> could >>> have been externalized in some way instead of being rewritten. >>> >>> So if uselessd wouldn't drop all the .timer, .device etc. and the udev >>> integration, it would be a real alternative. >>> >> >> But .timer .device etc is "those components could have been externalized >> in some way instead of being rewritten"? >> As I understand their page, it all was dropped in uselessd. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
