I'm +1 on this one. Hydra evaluates nixpkgs very fast. I'm only worried if the email is per build, not per jobset evaluation. Is that the case?
PS: Ideally it would test every commit (or bisect failing commit). On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Vladimír Čunát <[email protected]> wrote: > Cheers! > > On 10/23/2014 06:57 PM, Domen Kožar wrote: > >> Now it's *only* about keeping it that way ;-) >> > > Well, what about Hydra notifying committers/authors of changes that > (probably) cause build breakages? IIRC it's just about enabling a switch, > and in the current state it might not generate so much noise (thinking > Linux only ATM). > > Vladimir > > > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
