Hi Mateusz, > We should mark the package as broken on i686 but I don't know the > ‘proper’ way to do it [...] so you'll have to wait for peti to do it > or explain the proper way.
I committed a "fix" in 0d32fca. The "broken" attribute prevents hackage4nix from re-generating that file, so the expression is essentially frozen in its current state until an update arrives. Personally, I wouldn't mind marking this package broken altogether. That 32 bit issue worries me already, but the fact that the author apparently doesn't know how to fix it makes me wonder whether I would want to depend on that code in my software. Anyway, that's just me. Best regards, Peter _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev