Maybe it would make more sense to only build the i686 builds if our tested set of x86_64 binaries build correctly. We would still release with both but it would cut down on a lot of redundant failures.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:39 PM Ryan Trinkle <[email protected]> wrote: > I encountered an i686 user just the other day! I don't use it personally, > but having solid support in Nix was fantastic, especially because older, > 32-bit machines tend to be slower, which makes Nix's binary caching > functionality even more important. > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Shea Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Do we still have users running 32-bit machines? It would reduce the load >> on >> hydra significantly if we could drop support for i686, though of course if >> people are still relying on it we shouldn't make the change yet. >> >> ~Shea >> _______________________________________________ >> nix-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
