+1 This seems like a good idea.
On 12 May 2015 at 06:45, William Kennington <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe it would make more sense to only build the i686 builds if our tested > set of x86_64 binaries build correctly. We would still release with both > but it would cut down on a lot of redundant failures. > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:39 PM Ryan Trinkle <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I encountered an i686 user just the other day! I don't use it >> personally, but having solid support in Nix was fantastic, especially >> because older, 32-bit machines tend to be slower, which makes Nix's binary >> caching functionality even more important. >> >> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Shea Levy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Do we still have users running 32-bit machines? It would reduce the load >>> on >>> hydra significantly if we could drop support for i686, though of course >>> if >>> people are still relying on it we shouldn't make the change yet. >>> >>> ~Shea >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nix-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nix-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
