On 25 Sep 2015 15:29, "Joachim Schiele" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> two problems i see here:
> - text can't be covered by GPL thus they created CC
I suggested nix{os,pkgs} to be GPL3 or MPLv2 not the wiki.
> - some edits in the wiki are anonymous (whom to ask?)
I wouldn't care about anonymous edits. Proving it is hard.
> i like that we are adressing this issue now. it is very important.
>
> i'd go for CC BY SA 3.0
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
> as IMHO this fits the other licenses pretty well
yes I personally prefer this license.
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
