talk to any tech writer... wiki is _NOT_ a documentation. it is the most perverse form of somthing looking like documentation. the only thing that wiki can be good for is to fill the time gap until "real" documentation is produced.
i would rather see the discussion why things from wiki are not in manual, or how to extend current manual with a collection of tutorials. and i couldn't care less about which tools do i have to use. although i would vote -1 for hackyll with requirement of 1G to download a simple static page generator. but i understand that we as developers rather talk about the tools and not the content of documentation :) On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Matthias Beyer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26-09-2015 08:12:30, Vladimír Čunát wrote: > > On 09/26/2015 12:07 AM, Matthias Beyer wrote: > > > I agree. I wanted to create a new organization for this and publish > > > the repository on the organizations account and github page. > > > > > > Something like github.com/nixos-wiki > > > > > > or something similar. I explicitely want _not_ to include the wiki in > > > the "normal" nixos account. > > > > There's no need for another organization, I think. It's already the case > > that nixos members have different access to different repositories. > > > > ... and I'm a bit concerned that a nixos-wiki repository results in > the same mess as the nixpkgs, where everybody pushes around. But > that's another topic and should be discussed elsewhere, of course. > > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > Kind regards, > Matthias Beyer > > Proudly sent with mutt. > Happily signed with gnupg. > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > > -- Rok Garbas http://www.garbas.si [email protected]
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
