Does

$ nix-store --read-log /run/current-system/sw

say anything interesting?

$ nix-store -q -deriver /run/current-system/sw

will output a filename.  Are there references to AgdaStdlib in that file?

On Sat, 3 Oct 2015, Taeer Bar-Yam wrote:

Assumption I: Check. Putting in bad syntax to configuration.nix results in an 
error from nixos-rebuil
Assumption II: I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "check under test_profile"
The directory at `nix-build --no-out-link "<nixpkgs>" -A AgdaStdlib` has a 
share/agda directory, which I think is what you're looking for.
Assumption III: I have succeeded in installing other packages. (e.g. emacs) 
With this syntax. There is an emacs folder in /run/current-system/sw/share/
putting "42" in that same place does result in an error.
Assumption IV: I'm not sure how this works. Where is all-packages.nix? I 
switched to the unstable branch with nix-channel, but that should be a 
user-level change, right? Not system-level.
Assumption V: nixos-rebuild switch changes what I have installed. That should 
rule out that problem, no?

Thanks for the help. Any other things that could be going wrong?

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Bryan Gardiner <[email protected]> wrote:
      On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 19:40:19 -0700
      James Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

      > On 2 October 2015 at 13:12, Taeer Bar-Yam <[email protected]> wrote:
      > > I recently added pkgs.haskellPackages.Agda and pkgs.AgdaStdlib to my
      > > environment.systemPackages (in configuration.nix), and Agda still 
can't find
      > > the stdlib packages.
      > >
      > > I discussed this with someone on IRC for a while, and we discovered 
that I
      > > don't have an "agda" folder in /run/current-system/sw/share/ which I 
am
      > > supposed to have if pkgs.AgdaStdlib is in environment.systemPackages.
      > >
      > > Furthermore, when they put the same line in their configuration.nix, 
that
      > > folder did appear in their /run/current-system/sw/share/
      > >
      > > I'm sure this will come up, so I'll confirm now: I have `nixos-rebuild
      > > switch`ed to the new system.
      > >
      > > Does anyone have an idea of what's going on here? Is there any other
      > > diagnostic information that would be helpful?
      > >
      > >   --Taeer
      >
      > Hi Taeer,
      >
      > That's really strange. I think you will have to debug this on your
      > end. All I can think if is to examine every little step that makes us
      > think putting pkgs.AgdaStdlib in your configuration should make it
      > appear under /run/current-system/sw/share/. For example:
      >
      > - Assumption: nixos-rebuild is reading your configuration.nix. You
      > could test this by putting some bad syntax at the start of
      > configuration.nix and rebuilding.
      >
      > - Assumption: pkgs.AgdaStdlib produces a "share/agda" directory with
      > the version of nixpkgs you are using. You could try installing it with
      > nix-env -p test_profile -i -A pkgs.AgdaStdlib and checking under
      > test_profile
      >
      > - Assumption: Your syntax for specifying environment.systemPackages is
      > correct. Try putting other packages there and see if their files show
      > up under /run/current-system/sw/share/. Try putting something that's
      > not a package there (e.g. the number 42) and see if nixos-rebuild
      > complains (it should).
      >
      > - Assumption: nixos-rebuild is using the version of nixpkgs you think
      > it's using. You could test this by messing up your nixpkgs (e.g. by
      > adding bad syntax to all-packages.nix) and seeing if nixos-rebuild
      > complains.

There's also the one that tripped me up:

- Assumption: NixOS is mounting /boot properly, otherwise new system
  generations won't take effect on boot but 'switch' will think
  everything's applied.





--
Russell O'Connor                                      <http://r6.ca/>
``All talk about `theft,''' the general counsel of the American Graphophone
Company wrote, ``is the merest claptrap, for there exists no property in
ideas musical, literary or artistic, except as defined by statute.''
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Reply via email to