Nothing's stopping you from starting the conversion. If it's clearly better, it will be a lot easier to convince people once you have actual code to show.
On 2015-12-30 20:30, stewart mackenzie wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 4:04 AM, jeaye <[email protected]> wrote: >> As C++ devs, I think it's important that we consider using a safer, >> more >> functional language everywhere we can. Rust does this very well, to >> the >> point where me enumerating its benefits would be redundant. The >> point I >> want to make is that, if there's ever a choice between C++ and Rust, >> and >> some niche features like template meta-programming aren't required, >> Rust >> is the safer, more modern option. > > In agreement. > > Adopting Rust turned out to be one of the better moves we made. > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
