I really don't see a correlation between rewriting perl parts in C++ and why/how we should rewrite Nix in a different language. Could we separate the threads?
Mateusz, did you get an answer to your questions to be able to start contributing? On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:05 PM, stewart mackenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > Language features of the implementation language are generally lost when > implementing a new language. > > So we are left with: "can be compiled and existing infrastructure." > > Leveraging LLVM would be astute. > > On 31 Dec 2015 21:47, "Tomasz Czyż" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Why not haskell? > > > > It's functional (like nix), can be compiled, in nixos, there is already > infrastructure for it. > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
