On 16-01-04 12:34am, [email protected] wrote: > If someone is interested in a pure Rust implementation, then a prerequsite > would be to > come up with a rigorous definition of the language and all of the builtins, > and then > identifying the unix specific builitins and derivation behavior. I say this > because that > alone would be a worthwile effort, it is something that I would like to see > done, and > should be enough work to discourage anyone who thinks rewriting Nix is a good > idea. > > Emery
fyi jwiegley is working on a Haskell implementation. https://github.com/jwiegley/hnix Of course this leads to discovery of undocumented bits of the language, e.g. the shadowing of identifiers imported by with vs. created by let. -- Proudly written in Mutt with Vim on NixOS. Q: Why is this email five sentences or less? A: http://five.sentenc.es May take up to five days to read your message. If it’s urgent, call me.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
