On 01/06/2016 06:36 PM, stewart mackenzie wrote: > Shall we start defining the nix language?
None of the perl stuff deals directly with the nix language, so that seems rather a much independent issue. Personally, I think there are few enough people who contribute to the nix repo as it is now. Do you think starting another implementation would help the quality or something else? Even in a horizon of up to several years? --Vladimir
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
