It's possible, the nixpkgs-unstable and nixos-unstable both evolve independently as they have different "success" conditions.
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, 13:38 Maarten Hoogendoorn, <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, that could be very well the cause of this. Is the OS X build lagging > behind the NixOS one? I thought if some package was present in the unstable > channel, that hydra would have build it and uploaded it to the binary cache? > > 2016-06-07 14:30 GMT+02:00 zimbatm <[email protected]>: > >> In general I found that there are less packages available from the cache >> on OSX. What probably happened is that the packages had to be built. If >> doCheck = true then tests are run after the build and this is the default >> for python packages. >> >> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, 13:19 Maarten Hoogendoorn, <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> I have been a really happy Nix{,pkgs,os,ops} for some time. In fact, I'm >>> writing two intro blog posts about nix during working hours for Container >>> Solutions. Since most of the developers that will read the blogpost will be >>> running OS X, I've borrowed a spare macbook, and installed nix and nixops. >>> >>> To my surprise, this caused python tests to run. Is this the expected >>> behavior? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Maarten >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nix-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
