Ah, I see ;) Now it makes sense. 2016-06-07 14:42 GMT+02:00 zimbatm <[email protected]>:
> It's possible, the nixpkgs-unstable and nixos-unstable both evolve > independently as they have different "success" conditions. > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, 13:38 Maarten Hoogendoorn, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ah, that could be very well the cause of this. Is the OS X build lagging >> behind the NixOS one? I thought if some package was present in the unstable >> channel, that hydra would have build it and uploaded it to the binary cache? >> >> 2016-06-07 14:30 GMT+02:00 zimbatm <[email protected]>: >> >>> In general I found that there are less packages available from the cache >>> on OSX. What probably happened is that the packages had to be built. If >>> doCheck = true then tests are run after the build and this is the default >>> for python packages. >>> >>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, 13:19 Maarten Hoogendoorn, <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>> I have been a really happy Nix{,pkgs,os,ops} for some time. In fact, >>>> I'm writing two intro blog posts about nix during working hours for >>>> Container Solutions. Since most of the developers that will read the >>>> blogpost will be running OS X, I've borrowed a spare macbook, and installed >>>> nix and nixops. >>>> >>>> To my surprise, this caused python tests to run. Is this the expected >>>> behavior? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Maarten >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> nix-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >>>> >>> >>
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
