To give you an idea, there are still 109 issues that were updated in the
last 2 weeks:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20%20updated%3A%3E%3D2016-07-08

This is already quite enough to work on.

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:37 AM Wout Mertens <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That's the thing about auto-reopening, it makes sure that people
> interested in seeing the issue fixed are reminded of the issue so they can
> continue fixing it, as well as automatically weeding out the issues that
> are no longer important.
>
> All the *real* issues will stay active, since people will reopen them. All
> the rest will be available in the history.
>
> I think 14 days is enough time between reminders for an open source
> project. Shorter is annoying since we can't work on open source every day,
> and longer will just lead to more stale issues.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM Oliver Charles <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> But if the problem is you think old issues are skewing the results/making
>> it hard to find the signal, then can't you just use more intelligent search
>> filters? E.g., things created in the past 3 months.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:15 AM Eelco Dolstra <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 07/22/2016 09:06 AM, Wout Mertens wrote:
>>>
>>> > We have 1238 open issues and 286 open PRs.
>>> >
>>> > That is just too much to reason about.
>>> >
>>> > How about using something like https://github.com/twbs/no-carrier
>>> which
>>> > auto-closes after 14 days of inactivity, and reopens on a new comment?
>>>
>>> There is something to be said for auto-closing issues after a long time
>>> (e.g.
>>> Fedora auto-closes inactive issues from CURRENT-2 releases ago), but 14
>>> days is
>>> waaaay to short. Bugs don't disappear after 14 days...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://nixos.org/~eelco/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nix-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nix-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>>
>
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Reply via email to