This one: https://www.codetriage.com/nixos/nixpkgs
On 07/22/2016 03:30 PM, Kevin Cox wrote: > I'm not a huge fan of auto-closing issues based on just activity. The one > auto-close feature I do like is the `need info` tag when you need more from > the reporter. Then the issue is closed in a week or two if they don't respond. > > The reason I don't like auto-closing issues is that it seems more like > fighting the symptom then the problem. Just because you close an issue > doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. I think a better way is to get more > triager to quickly put issues on the wishlist or find an assignee. Rather > then close it is probably better to have an "important" or tag of things that > should be looked at first (and maybe try to keep that close to zero). I see > little value to closing issues just because we don't want to work on them > right now. > > It is really painful that only commiters can add tags because I would love to > help out with triaging more then just commenting (I think comments often have > low value because you can't filter on them). > > One other thing that might help is I remember a service that would send a > couple of open issues to your inbox to help divide the load of triaging. I'm > going to see if I can find it again as it would probably be useful. > > > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
